AI Content Detector
Analyze text for patterns commonly associated with AI-generated content. Check perplexity, burstiness, and repetition scores.
Last reviewed by the Radiatus Cloud team
Securing AI in production?
We build guardrails, governance & compliance for AI systems.
Check text for AI-generation signals
Telling whether text was written by a human or a model is increasingly relevant, for educators, editors and publishers. This tool analyses text for patterns commonly associated with AI generation, such as perplexity signals, giving an indication rather than a verdict.
Why detection is inherently uncertain
AI text detection looks for statistical signatures, text that is unusually smooth and predictable, low in the surprising word choices a human makes, which is roughly what perplexity measures. But these signals are imperfect: capable models produce human-like text, humans sometimes write predictably, and editing blurs the line. So any detector gives a probability, not proof, and false positives, flagging genuine human writing, are a real and serious risk. The honest use is as one weak signal among several, never as a sole basis for an accusation, which is a limitation worth stating plainly.
A signal, not a verdict
The tool runs entirely in your browser, so nothing you paste, prompts, outputs or documents, is uploaded, which matters when the input is sensitive AI data or your own content.
Related tools
- AI Prompt Leakage Analyzer — Paste a system prompt and a hostile user input to see whether the prompt holds secrets and whether the input carries injection patterns. Local, instant.
- LLM Data Exposure Checker — Check if text contains data likely to be memorized or exposed by LLMs.
- AI Usage Policy Generator — Generate an acceptable use policy for AI tools in your company.
- Model Hallucination Estimator — Estimate risk of hallucinations based on task type and temperature.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does AI content detection work?
It looks for statistical signatures of machine text, such as being unusually smooth and predictable, which perplexity roughly measures, versus the surprise of human writing.
Is it reliable?
No, not as proof. Capable models produce human-like text and humans sometimes write predictably, so detectors give a probability, not a verdict.
What about false positives?
They are a real and serious risk: genuine human writing can be flagged. This is why a detector must never be the sole basis for an accusation.
How should I use the result?
As one weak signal among several, informing a judgement rather than making it. Treat a flag as a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Is my text uploaded?
No. The analysis runs entirely in your browser.
Privacy & Security
Analyzed locally in browser. No text is sent to any server.
About This Tool
This tool runs entirely in your browser. No data is sent to any server, ensuring complete privacy. Simply use the interface above to get started β no registration or login required.
Disclaimer: This tool is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Results are for educational and utility purposes.
Related Tools
AI Prompt Leakage Analyzer
AI SecurityPaste a system prompt and a hostile user input to see whether the prompt holds secrets and whether the input carries injection patterns. Local, instant.
LLM Data Exposure Checker
AI SecurityCheck if text contains data likely to be memorized or exposed by LLMs.
AI Usage Policy Generator
AI SecurityGenerate an acceptable use policy for AI tools in your company.