Finance

Safe Withdrawal Calculator

Model how long a portfolio lasts at a given withdrawal rate, and understand where the 4 percent rule came from and where it breaks.

Last reviewed by the Radiatus Cloud team

Output

Planning cloud or compliance spend?

Our team optimises cloud cost & risk for finance leaders.

Get a cost review

Where the 4 percent rule came from

The Trinity Study and William Bengen's earlier work examined US market history and asked what withdrawal rate, adjusted annually for inflation, would have survived every historical 30-year period. The answer was about 4 percent of the starting balance. It is a backward-looking result from one country's unusually strong century, not a law, and the people who produced it have consistently described it as a planning benchmark rather than a guarantee.

What the rule assumes

A 30-year horizon, a portfolio of roughly 50 to 75 percent equities, annual inflation adjustments, and US historical returns. Retiring at 50 rather than 65 stretches the horizon to 40 or 50 years, where the sustainable rate drops toward 3 to 3.5 percent. A more conservative portfolio lowers it further, because bonds alone have historically struggled to outpace inflation across long horizons.

Sequence of returns risk

This is the mechanism that actually causes failure. Two portfolios with identical average returns produce completely different outcomes depending on when the bad years land. A severe fall in the first few years, while you are withdrawing, permanently reduces the capital that would otherwise have compounded. The same fall twenty years later is largely survivable. Average returns are almost irrelevant; their order is decisive.

Flexibility is worth more than precision

The historical failures nearly all involve rigid inflation-adjusted withdrawals through a market crash. Reducing spending modestly during bad years, or skipping the inflation increase after a fall, improves survival dramatically. A retiree who can cut discretionary spending by 10 percent in a downturn can safely start at a meaningfully higher rate than one who cannot.

Treat the output as a range

Any single number here is false precision. Model 3, 3.5 and 4 percent and look at the spread of outcomes rather than the headline figure, and revisit the plan every few years against what actually happened rather than what was projected.

Related tools

  • Compound Interest Calculator — Project how savings or investments grow with compound interest and regular contributions, in both nominal and inflation-adjusted terms.
  • Mortgage Calculator — Calculate mortgage payments from price, deposit, rate and term, with total interest, amortisation and the costs beyond principal and interest.
  • EMI Calculator — Calculate equated monthly instalments for a loan, with total interest, amortisation breakdown and the effect of prepayment.
  • Paycheck / Salary Calculator — Work out net pay per paycheck after tax and deductions, including the extra-paycheck months.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the 4 percent rule still valid?

It remains a reasonable planning benchmark for a 30-year retirement with a substantial equity allocation, drawn from US market history. It is a backward-looking result from one country's strong century, not a guarantee, and its authors describe it that way.

What rate suits early retirement?

Lower. A 40 or 50 year horizon pushes the sustainable rate toward 3 to 3.5 percent, because there is more time for an adverse sequence to occur and less certainty that historical patterns hold.

What is sequence of returns risk?

The order of returns matters more than their average. A severe fall in the first few years of drawdown permanently destroys capital that would have compounded, while the same fall twenty years in is largely survivable.

Does being flexible help?

Substantially. Most historical failures involve rigid inflation-adjusted withdrawals through a crash. Cutting discretionary spending modestly in bad years, or skipping the inflation rise after a fall, improves survival a great deal.

Should I trust a single projected number?

No. Model a range of rates and look at the spread of outcomes rather than one figure, then revisit every few years against what actually happened rather than what was projected.

Privacy & Security

Runs entirely in your browser. Retirement figures are not uploaded.

Data: None
Client-side-Side
Active
v1.0

How to Use

Enter your retirement corpus, withdrawal rate, expected annual return, inflation on withdrawals and the number of retirement years to project sustainability.

Disclaimer: This tool is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Results are for educational and utility purposes.