API Mock Data Generator
Generate realistic fake data for testing, seeding databases and building interfaces before the backend exists.
Last reviewed by the Radiatus Cloud team
Need this built for your product?
We design, build & host secure software & APIs.
Realistic beats random
Random strings pass a schema and prove nothing. Real data has properties that break naive code: names contain apostrophes, hyphens and non-Latin characters; addresses are not always structured; email domains repeat; some fields are legitimately empty. Test data made of "aaaa" and sequential integers passes every test and lets the same bugs reach production. The point of realistic generation is to reproduce the awkwardness of real input before users supply it.
Test the edges deliberately
Include the maximum-length string your schema allows, an empty string where null is also possible, a name with an emoji, a date at a daylight-saving boundary, a negative number where only positives are expected, and text containing quotes and angle brackets. These are where validation, encoding and storage actually fail. A dataset of plausible middle-of-the-range values tests the happy path only.
Referential integrity has to be generated, not hoped for
Seeding orders with random customer IDs produces orders belonging to nobody, and every join returns fewer rows than expected. Generate parents first, retain their identifiers, and draw children from that set. The same applies to enums, foreign keys and any field whose valid values are defined elsewhere.
Distribution matters for performance testing
Real data is skewed. A few customers have thousands of orders and most have one. Uniformly distributed test data makes every query look fast, because it never produces the large result sets, deep pagination and index scans that cause problems in production. If the point is performance, the shape of the distribution matters more than the volume.
Determinism makes failures reproducible
A fixed random seed produces the same dataset every run, so a failing test can be investigated rather than re-rolled. Unseeded generation creates tests that pass ninety-nine times and fail once with no way to reproduce the input, which is worse than no test.
Never use production data as test data
Copying a production database into staging is the most common route to a personal data breach that nobody intended. Under GDPR and similar regimes it is processing without a lawful basis, and staging environments are consistently less protected than production. Generated data carries none of that exposure. Where production-shaped data is genuinely needed, the requirement is proper anonymisation, and note that removing names is not anonymisation when the remaining fields still identify people.
Related tools
- JSON Formatter — Format and beautify JSON in your browser. Pinpoints syntax errors by line and column, flags unsafe integers, and never uploads your data to a server.
- JSON Validator — Validate JSON syntax with precise line and column errors, and check documents against a JSON Schema. Runs locally in your browser, nothing uploaded.
- Regex Tester — Test regular expressions against sample text with live match highlighting, capture groups and flag control. Runs entirely in your browser.
- HTML Minifier — Minify HTML by removing comments and redundant whitespace, without breaking inline elements or pre blocks. Runs entirely in your browser.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why not just use random strings for test data?
Because they pass every check and prove nothing. Real names contain apostrophes and non-Latin characters, real fields are sometimes empty, and code that only ever sees clean input fails on real users.
What edge cases should test data include?
Maximum-length strings, empty values, emoji in names, dates at daylight-saving boundaries, negative numbers where only positives are expected, and text containing quotes and angle brackets.
How do I keep foreign keys valid?
Generate parents first and draw children from the identifiers actually created. Random foreign keys produce orphaned rows and joins that silently return fewer results than expected.
Does the distribution of test data matter?
For performance testing, more than the volume. Real data is skewed, so uniform test data never produces the large result sets and deep pagination that cause production problems.
Can I use production data for testing?
It is the most common route to an unintended personal data breach, and under GDPR it is processing without a lawful basis. Generated data avoids the exposure entirely.
Privacy & Security
Data generated locally.
About This Tool
This tool runs entirely in your browser. No data is sent to any server, ensuring complete privacy. Simply use the interface above to get started — no registration or login required.
Disclaimer: This tool is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Results are for educational and utility purposes.
Related Tools
JSON Formatter
DeveloperFormat and beautify JSON in your browser. Pinpoints syntax errors by line and column, flags unsafe integers, and never uploads your data to a server.
JSON Validator
DeveloperValidate JSON syntax with precise line and column errors, and check documents against a JSON Schema. Runs locally in your browser, nothing uploaded.
Regex Tester
DeveloperTest regular expressions against sample text with live match highlighting, capture groups and flag control. Runs entirely in your browser.